Pages Navigation Menu

“Hey Sundance, Who Are Those Guys?”

Each day that Ammon Bundy and his band of armed militiamen stay holed up at the Malheur Refuge, they make us wonder, in the words of Butch Cassidy, “Who are those guys?” They’re adamant that they will 750x-1not leave until the federal government gives them back their land so they can graze livestock wherever they want.  Yet in actual truth, they do graze their cattle and sheep pretty much wherever they want.

Approximately 230 million acres of federal land out west is allocated for livestock grazing, with the grazing fees less than 10% of what ranchers pay to graze on private lands. Yet even then, most western ranching operations are not economically profitable. And cattle grazed on public land represent less than 3% of the national beef supply. So who are the Bundys and the others who would threaten federal officials with assault rifles to “protect” a nonviable and probably difficult way of life? What do they really want?

I think the answer lies in George Wuerthner’s astute observation that the western ranchers’ identity is tied into entrenched American attitudes about beef, cowboys and the western frontier. Wuerthner is an activist and Projects Director of the Foundation for Deep Ecology, publisher of an eye-opening book called Welfare Ranching: The Subsidized Destruction of the American West. He points out that many of the early colonists were from northern Europe where meat was primarily available only to the aristocracy. Meat was a symbol of wealth and prosperity – as it now is many underdeveloped nations. And this view was brought to America where cattle grazing land was cheap or free, and land barons amassed huge herds.

Moreover, in this wild west, ranching became the first step in domesticating the landscape and taming the wilderness. Wuerthner 6655741writes, “At an even deeper level, the cattle culture is based on a world view that sees nature as requiring control, and those who do the controlling as powerful people.” This notion gave birth to the rodeo – a symbol of the taming of wild animals. The cowboy, with his strength and toughness, rides the wild, bucking bronco and captures the fleeing bull with his lasso. Thus, the idea of preserving wildlands and biodiversity runs entirely counter to the self-image of “real” cowboys like Ammon Bundy.

The image of the cowboy is at the epicenter of the frontier. He is rugged and tough, loyal and ethical. Americans have romanticized the cowboy in movies, music, and art. He is the Marlboro man – a man Marlboro manwho won’t back down from a fight.

I dare say, too, he won’t back down from his outrage that the world is changing and the frontier-for-the-taking days are over.  In a 2005 study conducted by the Western Economics Forum, both large and small ranchers said that the primary reason for owning a ranch was for the preservation of land ownership, family tradition, culture and values. But along comes the federal government responding to public pressure to preserve a refuge for birds, and on an even broader scale, a world  that is opening up to diversity, gender equality, animal rights, veganism. Pull back even farther and we are confronted with a world that must cope with climate change.Effectsof-HMKaroo

Who are those guys? George Wuerthner knows. They are the modern day John Waynes who see themselves as personifying American values of individualism, strength and male competency. They are waging a battle for a lifestyle that must come to an end if we are to forestall environmental destruction and species extinction. Thus attempts to fight the government that is slowly reforming livestock production “will not be successful until the symbolism of ‘meat’ and ‘cowboy’ is carefully deconstructed, and the premise of controlling nature – inherent in the livestock industry – is challenged.” (Wuerthner, Welfare Ranching: The Subsidized Destruction of the American West)




  1. I worked for Region 1 (where the Malheur National Wildlife Refuge is located) of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service during the Malheur occupation. It was a frustrating period for all employees. People from my office routinely developed close working relationships with ranchers on private lands conservation projects and with several Western state governments on sage grouse conservation. Where feasible, we would step in to give what help we could to ranchers to restore rangelands following wildland fires and other similar emergencies. The occupation seemed like discounting of the many relationships we had built. The fact that quite a number of ranchers disagreed with the occupation and its purpose and spoke out regarding their good working relationships with the Refuge, while nice to hear, wasn’t all that much help in assuaging our frustration. Your post provides some good observations–thanks. I’ve heard of Welfare Ranching: The Subsidized Destruction of the American West but haven’t yet read it.

  2. If you can find it and it may be out of print, The Kingdom in the Country by James Conaway is also good.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *